
Through many years of being to some extent in a lover’s quarrel with the church, I never imagined that churches or synagogues or mosques or temples in any state in America would be required by law to decline to offer aid or shelter to people in need. Of course, I don’t think it was the intent of the writers of the bill in Arizona to require people in any religion to retreat from their commitment to being compassionate and kind. It is an unsophisticated piece of legislation formulated and agreed to by frustrated people who didn’t think about what their new law will require people to do. They did not think through the implications of their law, but that doesn’t excuse them. They have created a legal situation which is in opposition to the basic examples and teachings of the founders of all of the world's great religions. We are told by Jesus to love one another. He told us that when we give water to a thirsty person, we give it to him. The thought that we would be required to check the thirsty person’s immigration status is absurd.
Nothing is more basic to my faith than simple human kindness. What recourse would I have if I were a citizen of Arizona and my state could punish me for following the basic teachings of Jesus. I hope I should have the courage to follow the Golden Rule even if the law requires me to violate it.

2 comments:
Right on, Jerral, as you discuss the new Arizona law. The state is, of course, quite conservative but Irene and i know a number of folks there who would applaud your point of view. You put it well when you mention your "Lovers quarrel with the Christian church. That reflects my experience as well. I do know that the Arizona legislature is loaded with people of the Latter Day Saints variety plus others of a like right-wing leaning. Lets hope that the people of Arizona regain their senses and repeal their terrible law.
Jim
Jim,
I heard from Mary Louise Ross that there may be a plan in Utah for that state to follow Arizona's lead.
Jerral
Post a Comment