
TRAVEL PHOTOGRAPHY challenges me because I have picture-postcard images already in my mind of the most famous places in the world, and I too often find myself validating my experience of travel by seeing and photographing exactly what everybody else has seen in Paris or Buenos Aires or St. Petersburg or Tokyo. What can you do with the Eiffel Tower that hasn’t already been done?
When I am in an iconic setting, if I have presence of mind enough to think before I shoot, I deliberately look for strangeness. If I’m in Paris looking up at the Tower from Pont de Bir Hakeim or from Quai de Grenelle, I see what everybody else sees who has ever approached it with a camera. But I want to see more. Perhaps there is someone with an unusual hat, or someone who is moving in an uncommon way across the scene. Maybe there are people clustered in an interesting way. Going back at night with my camera and a tripod doesn’t make that much difference because everybody has already seen a hundred pictures of the Eiffel Tower glowing in the dark . But the important thing is that I keep trying. I keep trying to really see. Looking for a photograph in a scene is what I like to do.

Sometimes I don’t find anything more than everybody sees, so I settle for a well-composed image by consciously imagining tic-tac-toe lines in the view-finder. I move the camera so that various points of interest stand or rest at the intersections of imaginary lines. I do what Renaissance painters consciously did... the same thing that Greek and Roman artists and philosophers discovered a couple of millennia earlier: I rely on the “rule of thirds” by looking through the view-finder the way the sixteenth-century painter looked at a rectangular canvas. Thinking in horizontal and vertical thirds when I’m looking through the view-finder helps me keep the center of interest in a scene out of the center of the picture, and I can mostly avoid the bull’s eye pictures that tourists seem unable to resist. If there is a horizon, I don’t let it split the frame exactly in upper and lower halves. I usually like the line of the horizon to be either a third of the way down from the top or a third of the way up from the bottom of the frame. Of course, rules are to be broken; and some of the most satisfying photographs are the result of putting something dead-center in the frame; so I don’t rule it out altogether. I try to remember not to rule anything out. One of the great things about digital photography is that a hundred shots cost no more than one.















